JPL Home Page JPL Home Page - Earth JPL Home Page - Solar System JPL Home Page - Stars and Galaxies JPL Home Page - Technology Sitemap Sitemap Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) California Institute of Technology (CalTech)
JPL Navigation
NASA logo Educational Quality Assurance Guide

Nature of Science/Quality of Science Teacher/Faculty Preparation and Enhancement Curriculum Support Program Evaluation Student Support Partnerships Functional Partnerships Institutional


TEACHER/FACULTY PREPARATION & ENHANCEMENT (... our endeavors to ... create learning opportunities, and enlighten inquisitive minds.)

Training Effectiveness | Teacher In-service Programs, K-12 | Relevance | Professional Development Standards | Teacher Effectiveness | Follow-Up | Delivery | Teacher Pre-service Programs, K-12


Training Effectiveness Top of page
INDICATOR What are characteristics of good professional development?  
SUPERIOR Focuses on specific, higher-order teaching strategies in content areas to increase the use of those strategies in the classroom.

Provides opportunities for active learning; is coherent or consistent with teachers' goals, and involves the participation of teachers from the same subject, grade level, or school.

The effort is both sustained and cumulative.

Teacher networks or study groups greatly enhance the professional development experience.

 
GOOD Provides opportunities for teacher learning in content area.

Fairly aligned with teachers' goals; participants are from the same subject, but may be from different schools or grade levels.

The effort is often sustained; teacher networks or study groups are an option, but not a requirement.

 
ACCEPTABLE Provides opportunities for teacher exposure in content area.

Participants are from the same subject, but from different schools and grade levels.

The effort is either sustained or cumulative; teacher networks or study groups are not well-structured or managed.

 
NEEDS REVISION Provides opportunities for teacher exposure in content area.

The effort is neither sustained nor cumulative. Teacher networks or study groups do not exist.

 


Teacher In-service Programs, K-12 Top of page
INDICATOR Are the workshops well-designed and frequent?  
SUPERIOR Programs or activities are frequent and coherent to enable positive change in teacher performances  
GOOD Programs or activities are frequent enough to enable positive change in teacher performances  
ACCEPTABLE Programs or activities are coherent, possibly not frequent enough for significant change in teacher behavior.  
NEEDS REVISION Programs or activities too infrequent or non-coherent to make observable change in teacher performance  


Relevance Top of page
INDICATOR How is the training topic chosen, and how important is it?  
SUPERIOR Activities are interesting and aligned with the expressed needs of teachers from large samples and indicators  
GOOD Activities are interesting, and somewhat aligned with the needs of teachers  
ACCEPTABLE Activities are interesting, but not necessarily aligned with the needs of teachers, or aligned from a sample too limited in scope  
NEEDS REVISION Activities are not aligned with the expressed needs or teachers  


Professional Development Standards Top of page
INDICATOR Are national standards for professional development used?  
SUPERIOR Exceptional alignment with standards for staff development, as well as national standards in science education. Consistently addresses teachers' needs as learners, opportunities for sharing experiences, reflection, and construction of knowledge and skills.  
GOOD Good alignment with standards for staff development, as well as national standards in science education. Often addresses teachers' needs as learners, opportunities for sharing experiences, reflection, and construction of knowledge and skills.  
ACCEPTABLE Aligns somewhat with standards for staff development, or with national standards in science education. Minimal concern for teachers' needs as learners.  
NEEDS REVISION No alignment with standards for professional development in general, or for science education in particular. Teachers are viewed as objects of reform rather than partners in reform.  


Teacher Effectiveness Top of page
INDICATOR How will teachers' skills be improved?  
SUPERIOR Educators use information and materials in more effective and observable ways to reach learning objectives. Teachers model and emphasize the skills, attitudes, and values of scientific inquiry.  
GOOD Substantial observable change in use of materials and information by teachers, relative to learning objectives. Some attention to skills of scientific inquiry.  
ACCEPTABLE Some observable change in use of materials and information by teachers. Some coverage of scientific inquiry  
NEEDS REVISION Teacher improvement in performance not observable. Lack of attention to scientific inquiry.  


Follow-up Top of page
INDICATOR What does good follow-up look like?  
SUPERIOR Training experiences include extensive time and support for teachers to improve their practice, eliciting their understandings, approaches, and related elements of instruction.  
GOOD Training experiences include some time and support for improvement of teaching practice  
ACCEPTABLE Training experiences include some time and support for improvement of teaching practice  
NEEDS REVISION Training experiences do not allow or support time for teachers to improve their practice  


Delivery Top of page
INDICATOR What is the ideal role for teachers in the training?  
SUPERIOR Teachers are active participants in the development of their own knowledge or understanding of the enterprise  
GOOD Teachers are active participants, emphasis is on understanding the enterprise  
ACCEPTABLE Teachers are active participants, emphasis is on knowledge of the enterprise  
NEEDS REVISION Teachers are passive recipients of information  


Teacher Pre-service Programs, K-12 Top of page
INDICATOR What are good pre-service programs like?  
SUPERIOR Program has excellent balance in both subject-matter content and pedagogy. Program serves a model for replication

Significant and exemplary degree of involvement by Education faculty

 
GOOD Program has good balance in both subject-matter content and pedagogy

High degree of involvement by Education faculty

 
ACCEPTABLE Program is adequate in subject-matter content, less than adequate in pedagogy

Some participation by Education faculty

 
NEEDS REVISION Programs rely too heavily on either content or pedagogy

No participation of Education faculty

 


Nature of Science/Quality of Science  |  Teacher/Faculty Prep & Enhancement |  Curriculum Support  |  Program Evaluation  |  Student Support  |  Partnerships Functional  |  Partnerships Institutional


Home

Content: Richard Alvidrez
Web Developer: Kristy Kawasaki