|
||||
| TEACHER/FACULTY PREPARATION & ENHANCEMENT (... our endeavors to ... create learning opportunities, and enlighten inquisitive minds.) | ||||
|
Training Effectiveness | Teacher In-service Programs, K-12 | Relevance | Professional Development Standards | Teacher Effectiveness | Follow-Up | Delivery | Teacher Pre-service Programs, K-12 |
||||
| Training Effectiveness |
| INDICATOR | What are characteristics of good professional development? | |
| SUPERIOR |
Focuses on specific, higher-order teaching strategies in content areas to increase the use of those strategies in the classroom.
Provides opportunities for active learning; is coherent or consistent with teachers' goals, and involves the participation of teachers from the same subject, grade level, or school. The effort is both sustained and cumulative. Teacher networks or study groups greatly enhance the professional development experience. |
|
| GOOD |
Provides opportunities for teacher learning in content area.
Fairly aligned with teachers' goals; participants are from the same subject, but may be from different schools or grade levels. The effort is often sustained; teacher networks or study groups are an option, but not a requirement. |
|
| ACCEPTABLE |
Provides opportunities for teacher exposure in content area.
Participants are from the same subject, but from different schools and grade levels. The effort is either sustained or cumulative; teacher networks or study groups are not well-structured or managed. |
|
| NEEDS REVISION |
Provides opportunities for teacher exposure in content area.
The effort is neither sustained nor cumulative. Teacher networks or study groups do not exist. |
| Teacher In-service Programs, K-12 |
| INDICATOR | Are the workshops well-designed and frequent? | |
| SUPERIOR | Programs or activities are frequent and coherent to enable positive change in teacher performances | |
| GOOD | Programs or activities are frequent enough to enable positive change in teacher performances | |
| ACCEPTABLE | Programs or activities are coherent, possibly not frequent enough for significant change in teacher behavior. | |
| NEEDS REVISION | Programs or activities too infrequent or non-coherent to make observable change in teacher performance |
| Relevance |
| INDICATOR | How is the training topic chosen, and how important is it? | |
| SUPERIOR | Activities are interesting and aligned with the expressed needs of teachers from large samples and indicators | |
| GOOD | Activities are interesting, and somewhat aligned with the needs of teachers | |
| ACCEPTABLE | Activities are interesting, but not necessarily aligned with the needs of teachers, or aligned from a sample too limited in scope | |
| NEEDS REVISION | Activities are not aligned with the expressed needs or teachers |
| Professional Development Standards |
| INDICATOR | Are national standards for professional development used? | |
| SUPERIOR | Exceptional alignment with standards for staff development, as well as national standards in science education. Consistently addresses teachers' needs as learners, opportunities for sharing experiences, reflection, and construction of knowledge and skills. | |
| GOOD | Good alignment with standards for staff development, as well as national standards in science education. Often addresses teachers' needs as learners, opportunities for sharing experiences, reflection, and construction of knowledge and skills. | |
| ACCEPTABLE | Aligns somewhat with standards for staff development, or with national standards in science education. Minimal concern for teachers' needs as learners. | |
| NEEDS REVISION | No alignment with standards for professional development in general, or for science education in particular. Teachers are viewed as objects of reform rather than partners in reform. |
| Teacher Effectiveness |
| INDICATOR | How will teachers' skills be improved? | |
| SUPERIOR | Educators use information and materials in more effective and observable ways to reach learning objectives. Teachers model and emphasize the skills, attitudes, and values of scientific inquiry. | |
| GOOD | Substantial observable change in use of materials and information by teachers, relative to learning objectives. Some attention to skills of scientific inquiry. | |
| ACCEPTABLE | Some observable change in use of materials and information by teachers. Some coverage of scientific inquiry | |
| NEEDS REVISION | Teacher improvement in performance not observable. Lack of attention to scientific inquiry. |
| Follow-up |
| INDICATOR | What does good follow-up look like? | |
| SUPERIOR | Training experiences include extensive time and support for teachers to improve their practice, eliciting their understandings, approaches, and related elements of instruction. | |
| GOOD | Training experiences include some time and support for improvement of teaching practice | |
| ACCEPTABLE | Training experiences include some time and support for improvement of teaching practice | |
| NEEDS REVISION | Training experiences do not allow or support time for teachers to improve their practice |
| Delivery |
| INDICATOR | What is the ideal role for teachers in the training? | |
| SUPERIOR | Teachers are active participants in the development of their own knowledge or understanding of the enterprise | |
| GOOD | Teachers are active participants, emphasis is on understanding the enterprise | |
| ACCEPTABLE | Teachers are active participants, emphasis is on knowledge of the enterprise | |
| NEEDS REVISION | Teachers are passive recipients of information |
| Teacher Pre-service Programs, K-12 |
| INDICATOR | What are good pre-service programs like? | |
| SUPERIOR |
Program has excellent balance in both subject-matter content and pedagogy. Program serves a model for replication Significant and exemplary degree of involvement by Education faculty |
|
| GOOD |
Program has good balance in both subject-matter content and pedagogy High degree of involvement by Education faculty |
|
| ACCEPTABLE |
Program is adequate in subject-matter content, less than adequate in pedagogy Some participation by Education faculty |
|
| NEEDS REVISION |
Programs rely too heavily on either content or pedagogy No participation of Education faculty |
| Nature of Science/Quality of Science | Teacher/Faculty Prep & Enhancement | Curriculum Support | Program Evaluation | Student Support | Partnerships Functional | Partnerships Institutional |
Content: Richard Alvidrez
Web Developer: Kristy Kawasaki